At the Brooklyn Public Library and feeling SO HAPPY! this IS THE ART LIBARARY of my dreams! certainly enough to combat my fierce denied access to wesleyan's art library...michael lehman came to my studio yesterday, and it was so great. he was very very helpful and critical and suggested so many great artists for me to look at!
Mickalene Thomas! so amazing- her sculpture but also her painting is so textured, and the way she moves through mediums, using installation for photography, all with the same subject, is very elegant and moving.
He also told me to look at Vanessa Beecroft and Amy mayfield.
Michael wished my wooden people had more in common with one another-- he said i should concentrate on the notion of 'crafting a scene.' He liked the nudity, not in adn of itself, but as a running thread of bodies. a predictable quality, one of hte only uniting elements.
When i explained my idea of a fighting army, he suggested unity in their weapons, or variations on the same fighting pose...all because he wants a more ALLEGORICAL READING. something i am constantly afraid of. but when i explained my "golden fleece conundrum" (so funny isnt it, how one's/my art identity becomes a series of troubled knocked up balls, memory balls, idea balls, made of different materials, roling around into one another?? constantly becoming more complicated and also growing towards each other, but still also remaining separate non-unifiable objects?)
------> Keith Roberts writes, in a book on Bruegel: "But contradictions, with great artists, do not weaken their art; they become points of tension that generate power." (PHAIDON: 1982, p. 14)
...ok, regressing, "golden fleece conundrum": ie i make a painting based on an image that for ME tells a story- i was 8 years old, this was my toga party, my dad was dressed as a minotaur and we are all chasing him with supersoakers to get the golden fleece- i am confronted with the dilemma that the picture i chose to use, edited out too much information from the story. there is no minotaur! the other children are suggested by their hands- but they are not there! so the story becomes more interesting (or more developed) than the imagery of the painting. Possibly true also of blankey. Actually, that is what janine antoni told me when she critiqued that piece, that the title would defniitely matter. This problem occureed with THe Tailor too, only i knew hte backstory, not so important, but i was trying to explain the work with the byline (stolen from AIR gallery) "the man i wish i was."
So anyways, this is an important criticism from Michael, and something Joey has tried to tell me in the past, and also the reason why i am now looking at Bruegel and Bosch and other fantastic allegorical painters who make complex symbolic scenes. ANy recommendations please shoot my way.
Michael also said htat creating a BIG EXPERIENCE relies on all the paintings realting to a BIG IDEA. ..he said something about the whole scene being constructed out of a big wood fire. and then a photograph of the paintings (and wood fire) burning? shot from birds eye view? i dotn know. He suggested that i spent some time culling & collecting source imagery, which is why i am here. And that worked for me wiht Pro Scientia as well, although the painting had otehr unresolved issues, i loved working form source material. and learning art history. maybe this can also be a catalyst for my timeline project at home.
Lehman also mentioned the erotic element present in the nudity. because the scale is human and the pieces are naked. one idea i had then was to make a human pyramid of naked men in the water! i mean submerge it, in the water, after building it, and photograph it so that you can see the reflection. who would be my models for htis project? sam and max...cody, (would he get naked with other men?) some coudl be partially clothed...the more the better, i think i need at least ten.
in my notes from michael i also wrote down"make your work speak from beyond the figure"
People are not interested in self-reflexive questions about painting (meta-painting) it is not enough that they can be momentarily mistaken for real life in a photograph mixed with reality, that trope is old, not conceptual.
He also told me to get a Peter Doig book, in which the simplest images really do tell stories. and to check out Luc Tuymans. and the SVA summer residency program and the summer pre-mfa at columbia. he started talking about rachel hearrison and dana schutz as examples of artists who use the figure but completely sublimate it into something conceptual. that is why he likes my bodysuits so much. as do i. and also he said the texture and form is so strong. i am very excited to continue that series alongside this one. and check out nick cave who makes somes sort of soundsuits.
OH SHIT IT STarTED POURING RAIN. i dont have a coat, i am wearing a white bra-less shirt, and i have far to walk with my heavy library books and computer! oh no! i am too excited i accidentally broek the rules and spoke in the quiet space.
My assignments for myself to get started properly are
1) paint non-humans on luan cut out and see what happens (like the boat i am developing)
2) paint cut outs and join them together by layering them in a stack of 3-5 with 2/3 inch spacers in between and light from above. my reference for this is something we had at my parents house growing up, that i dont know the name for, but i found it on amazon titled: CUT PAPER WOOD ART ASIAN NATURE THEME MINI 3D VIEW
3) stage some example photo shoots...put together a list of likely willing models, have teh INTSTRUCtioNS ready! not a party like last time, very specific goaals, fighting shots, or the human pyramd, or a swampy bayou battle, and stage these and execute them, etiher in unison or sequentially, either individually or in a group, and see how this wokr sout. BEING SURE TO HAVE A STORY WTIH ALL NEC. INFO AND ALSO UNIFYING CHARACTERISTICS OF SCENE.
either way the idea is to carry these assignments out in order to move forward simultaneiously and quickly and see what does and doesn't work. pushing wood you in a number of ways at once! so excited , rain has slowed, thank you michael!